Do Carbon Offsets works for Cutting Emissions Long Term?

As climate change becomes more visible, individuals and companies are increasingly looking for ways to reduce their environmental impact. One common approach is carbon offsets — projects that aim to remove or avoid carbon dioxide emissions elsewhere to compensate for emissions produced.

But a central question remains: do carbon offsets work? And if they do, how effective are they compared to direct emissions reduction?

This article examines the limits of carbon offsets, why they should not replace direct action, and how renewable energy investment can play a complementary role in climate strategies.

Carbon Offsets may not be a permanent solution

While carbon offsets can help to reduce emissions, they are not a permanent solution. The carbon reductions that are achieved through offsets are sometimes temporary, as the offset projects are not always maintained or sustained over time. Additionally, the true carbon reductions achieved through offsets are often difficult to quantify and verify, making it challenging to ensure that they are actually reducing emissions. This is because the carbon reductions achieved through offset projects are often temporary or uncertain, due to several factors such as:

Additionality

A core principle of carbon offsets requires projects to be additional, implying they wouldn't happen without offset funding. However, sometimes, projects may be planned or ongoing without extra funds, resulting in no further carbon reductions

Leakage

Offset projects risk leakage, displacing emissions from one area to another. If a renewable energy project replaces fossil fuel-based electricity in one region but the displaced fossil fuel-based electricity is utilized elsewhere, net carbon reductions may be absent.

Permanence

Carbon reductions from offset projects may be temporary if projects aren't maintained or sustained. For instance, a tree planting project sequesters carbon, but if trees are later removed or destroyed, the stored carbon re-enters the atmosphere.

Verification

Verifying actual carbon reductions from offset projects can be difficult. Methodologies may be unreliable, and monitoring or reporting mechanisms may lack adequacy, potentially skewing claimed emissions reductions.

Thus, while carbon offsets help reduce emissions, they shouldn't be considered a permanent solution.

Direct action is more effective

Direct action is the most effective method for cutting carbon emissions. Measures like enhancing energy efficiency, adopting renewable energy sources, and lowering consumption yield immediate environmental impact and decrease atmospheric carbon release. The most effective actions include:

Improving energy efficiency

Enhancing energy efficiency is a cost-effective method to cut carbon emissions. By decreasing energy consumption, it reduces emissions from power plants and other sources while lowering energy costs for individuals, businesses, and governments. Numerous policies and programs encourage and promote energy efficiency improvements.

Transitioning to renewable energy sources

Wind, solar, hydro, and geothermal power—renewable energy sources—don't emit carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases. As these technologies advance and costs drop, they increasingly compete with fossil fuels. Many countries and regions establish renewable energy targets, and various policies and programs support transitioning to renewable sources.

Reducing consumption

Lowering consumption is crucial for reducing carbon emissions, as it decreases energy and resource demand. Achievable through recycling, waste reduction, and fostering sustainable consumption habits, it is an important aspect of emissions reduction. Implementing circular economy principles, emphasizing material reuse and recycling, contributes to decreased consumption and emissions. Numerous policies and programs promote sustainable consumption and waste reduction. Ultimately, direct action, including energy efficiency improvements, renewable energy adoption, and reduced consumption, proves more effective than carbon offsets in addressing climate change.

‍

Direct action promotes a culture of sustainability

Taking direct action to reduce emissions promotes a culture of sustainability and encourages individuals and companies to take responsibility for their impact on the environment. By prioritizing sustainability in our actions, we can create a more sustainable future for ourselves and future generations.

Do Carbon Offsets Risk Encouraging Inaction?

Buying offsets may justify inaction and hinder direct emissions-reducing efforts. Though valuable, offsets should complement, not replace, direct action for maximum environmental impact.

Sole reliance on offsets breeds complacency, creating a false sense of security and undermining urgency for direct action. Offsets aren't permanent solutions and may not deliver expected reductions over time due to potential lack of maintenance or sustainability. Quantifying and verifying their effectiveness proves challenging, complicating emissions reduction confirmation.

Offsets face market volatility and fraud risks, which diminish their reliability as climate change mitigation tools.

While valuable in fighting climate change, offsets shouldn't replace direct action. By actively reducing our carbon footprint, we foster immediate environmental impact and cultivate a sustainability culture, encouraging responsible, eco-friendly behavior.

‍

Renewable Energy Investment as a Complementary Approach

Rather than treating offsets as a standalone solution, some models focus on expanding clean energy infrastructure directly.

Dyme, for example, directs part of its revenue toward renewable energy projects such as solar installations for schools and hospitals. These projects contribute to long-term emissions reduction by increasing access to clean power and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

This approach does not replace the need for emissions reduction, but it supports climate action by funding infrastructure that delivers ongoing environmental and social benefits.

‍

So, Do Carbon Offsets Work in Practice?

Carbon offsets can work in limited and specific cases, particularly for emissions that are currently difficult to eliminate. However, they are not a substitute for direct emissions reduction.

Effective climate strategies prioritise:

1. reducing emissions at the source
2. transitioning to renewable energy
3. lowering overall consumption
4. using offsets selectively and transparently

When applied carefully and alongside real reductions, offsets can complement climate action — but they cannot carry it alone.

Become a Dyme member to support cleaner, low-impact travel.

‍